Proving That a Lorentzian Structure Cannot be Put on S^2

In summary, proving that each manifold can have a Riemannian structure is relatively simple, using a local approach and partitions of unity. However, this proof does not work for signed metrics, even on manifolds with only two charts, such as S^2. It is known that it is not possible to put a metric with signature +1, -1 on S^2, despite it being diffeomorphic to R^2 minus a point. This is surprising as a Lorentz metric implies the existence of a non-vanishing vector field, something that the two-sphere does not have. Any ideas on how to prove this?
  • #1
MilesReid
1
0
It is fairly easy to prove that each manifold can be given a Riemannian structure. The argument is standard: locally you give the riemannian structure and then you use partions of unity. This proof breaks down for signed metrics. Even for a manifold requiring only two charts. For example, I've been told that you cannot put on S^2 a metric with signature +1, -1. This is quite remarkable, since on S^2-{p} diffeo to R^2 you can! Any ideas on proving it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The existence of a Lorentz metric implies the existence of a non-vanishing vector field (in physical terms, time's arrow is always defined). The two-sphere doesn't have one.
 

Related to Proving That a Lorentzian Structure Cannot be Put on S^2

1. What is a Lorentzian structure?

A Lorentzian structure is a mathematical object that describes the geometric properties of spacetime. It is a generalization of the Euclidean structure commonly used in geometry, but it incorporates the concept of time and allows for the measurement of distances and angles in four-dimensional spacetime.

2. Why is it important to prove that a Lorentzian structure cannot be put on S^2?

This proof is important in the field of mathematics and physics because it helps us understand the limitations of certain geometric structures and their applicability to real-world scenarios. In particular, proving that a Lorentzian structure cannot be put on S^2 has implications for our understanding of the curvature and topology of the universe.

3. What is S^2 and why is it significant in this context?

S^2, also known as the 2-sphere, is a mathematical object representing a two-dimensional surface that is curved, closed, and has constant positive curvature. It is significant in this context because it is a common example used in geometry and topology, making it a useful tool for studying and understanding different structures.

4. How is this proof typically approached?

The proof typically involves using mathematical techniques from differential geometry and topology, such as the Gauss-Bonnet theorem and the concept of conformal mappings. It also involves constructing a contradiction by assuming the existence of a Lorentzian structure on S^2 and showing that it leads to inconsistencies.

5. What are the implications of this proof for our understanding of spacetime?

This proof implies that S^2 cannot be considered as a valid model for spacetime with a Lorentzian structure. This means that the curvature and topology of our universe cannot be accurately represented by a Lorentzian structure on S^2. It also highlights the importance of considering other structures and models in our understanding of spacetime and the universe.

Similar threads

  • Differential Geometry
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Differential Geometry
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Differential Geometry
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • Differential Geometry
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
545
  • Quantum Physics
3
Replies
87
Views
5K
Back
Top