Work done pushing a spring from the side

In summary, the conversation discusses the formation of an integral for the work done and the use of two identical springs with a spring constant of 2k. The resulting force and work equations are corrected, and the integral formula is adjusted to account for the use of two springs.
  • #1
Ebby
41
14
Homework Statement
How much work must you do to push the midpoint of the string up or down a distance y?
Relevant Equations
F = -kx
W = Fy
spring1.PNG

spring2.PNG

spring4.PNG

My question is whether I've formed the integral for the work done correctly? It just seems a bit unwieldy to me...

If I call the extension of the spring ## x ##, I can see that ## z = \frac l 2 + x ## and ## z^2 = \left( \frac {l} {2} \right)^2 + y^2 ##. Combining them gives: $$ x = \sqrt {y^2 - l} $$

Since the restoring force generated by one spring is ## F_{res} = -k \sqrt {y^2 - l} ## along its axis, the force that must be exerted by me to overcome both springs is: $$ F_{me} = 2k \sqrt {y^2 - l} $$

Now, using ## W = \int |\vec F| \, \cos \theta \, |d \vec r| ## where ## cos \theta = \frac {y} {z} = \frac {y} {\frac {l} {2} + x} ## we can say that: $$ W_{me} = 2k \int_a^b \frac {y \sqrt {y^2 - l}} {\frac {l} {2} + \sqrt {y^2 - l}} \, dy $$ $$ = 2k \int_a^b \frac {y} {\frac {l} {2 \sqrt {y^2 - l}} + 1} \, dy $$
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
First of all your equation ##x = \sqrt {y^2 - l}## is dimensionally incorrect and that error propagates down your derivation. I'm sure that's a typo.
Ebby said:
Since the restoring force generated by one spring is ## F_{res} = -k \sqrt {y^2 - l} ## along its axis, the force that must be exerted by me to overcome both springs is: $$ F_{me} = 2k \sqrt {y^2 - l} $$
Why the doubling? Is this how we add vectors that have the same magnitude but point in different directions?
 
  • #3
Don't we have to be careful about the spring constant? Imagine two springs of length ##l/2## connected in series. If the full spring length ##l## has a spring constant of ##k##, then each spring of length ##l/2## must have spring constant ##k_{l/2} = ?##

Also…maybe the math of the dot product takes care of it, but I get something less messy by noticing something about the "work" from the horizontal components of the restoring force through the displacement?
 
Last edited:
  • #4
Ebby said:
My question is whether I've formed the integral for the work done correctly? It just seems a bit unwieldy to me...
If you are allowed to use the standard formula for the elastic potential energy of a spring ##(E = \frac 12 kx^2)##, then part (a) can be done without calculus. Simply consider the total extension.
 
  • Like
Likes malawi_glenn and Lnewqban
  • #5
Yeah I really messed that up. Take two.

I shall replace the single spring with two identical springs, each with a spring constant of ## 2k ##. This is equivalent.

Considering one of the springs, if I call its extension ## x ##, I can see that ## z = \frac l 2 + x ## and ## z^2 = \left( \frac {l} {2} \right)^2 + y^2 ##.

Combining gives: $$ x^2 + lx - y^2 = 0 $$ Solving for x: $$ x = \frac {-l \pm \sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2}} {2} $$ I only want the positive solution, so it's: $$ x = \frac {-l + \sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2}} {2} $$ Now, the force with which I push against each spring is: $$ F_{each} = 2kx = k(-l + \sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2}) $$ The force in the ## y ## direction is: $$ F_{each_{y}} = k(-l + \sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2})\cos\theta $$ $$ = \frac {k(-l + \sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2})y} {\frac l 2 + \frac {-l + \sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2}} {2}} $$ $$ = \frac {2k(-l + \sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2})y} {\sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2}} $$ $$ = 2ky(\frac {-l} {\sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2}} +1) $$ So the work done pushing against one spring is [EDIT: inserted missing integration symbol]: $$ W_{each_{y}} = 2k \int_a^b (\frac {-l} {\sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2}} +1)y \, dy $$ And against two springs [EDIT: inserted missing integration symbol]: $$ W_{both_{y}} = 4k \int_a^b (\frac {-l} {\sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2}} +1)y \, dy $$ Does this integral look right now?
 
Last edited:
  • #6
Ebby said:
Yeah I really messed that up. Take two.

I shall replace the single spring with two identical springs, each with a spring constant of ## 2k ##. This is equivalent.

Considering one of the springs, if I call its extension ## x ##, I can see that ## z = \frac l 2 + x ## and ## z^2 = \left( \frac {l} {2} \right)^2 + y^2 ##.

Combining gives: $$ x^2 + lx - y^2 = 0 $$ Solving for x: $$ x = \frac {-l \pm \sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2}} {2} $$ I only want the positive solution, so it's: $$ x = \frac {-l + \sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2}} {2} $$ Now, the force with which I push against each spring is: $$ F_{each} = 2kx = k(-l + \sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2}) $$ The force in the ## y ## direction is: $$ F_{each_{y}} = k(-l + \sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2})\cos\theta $$ $$ = \frac {k(-l + \sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2})y} {\frac l 2 + \frac {-l + \sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2}} {2}} $$ $$ = \frac {2k(-l + \sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2})y} {\sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2}} $$ $$ = 2ky(\frac {-l} {\sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2}} +1) $$ So the work done pushing against one spring is $$ W_{each_{y}} = 2ky(\frac {-l} {\sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2}} +1) \, dy $$ And against two springs: $$ W_{both_{y}} = 4ky(\frac {-l} {\sqrt {l^2 + 4y^2}} +1) \, dy $$ Does this integral look right now?
Thats what I got, but the extra algebra trying to use the extension can be avoided:

$$ F_{l/2} = k_{l/2} \left( z - \frac{l}{2}\right)$$

The vertical component of each spring is

$$ F_{y_{l/2}} = k_{l/2} \left( z - \frac{l}{2}\right) \cos \theta = k_{l/2} \left( z - \frac{l}{2}\right) \frac{y}{z} = k_{l/2} \left( 1 - \frac{l}{2 z}\right) y $$

Then multiply by 2 for each spring contribution:

$$ dW = F_{y_{l/2}}~dy = 2 k_{l/2} \left( 1 - \frac{l}{2 \sqrt{ (l/2)^2 + y^2}}\right) y~dy $$
 
Last edited:
  • #7
@erobz Yes that's better. (Btw, I know you meant ## \cos\theta ##.)

I'm just going over this to see if I can get the same answer from the elastic potential energy equation suggested by @Steve4Physics.
 
  • Like
Likes erobz
  • #8
Ebby said:
@erobz Yes that's better. (Btw, I know you meant ## \cos\theta ##.)

I'm just going over this to see if I can get the same answer from the elastic potential energy equation suggested by @Steve4Physics.
Oh, I chose the opposite angle in my working. Didn’t notice you hadn’t picked that one in your diagram. I’ll fix it.
 
  • #9
Ebby said:
I'm just going over this to see if I can get the same answer from the elastic potential energy equation suggested by @Steve4Physics.
It does work out, and it is quite efficient in comparison.
 
  • Like
Likes Steve4Physics and Lnewqban
  • #10
erobz said:
It does work out, and it is quite efficient in comparison.
Yep I did it. Much more efficient.
 
  • Like
Likes erobz and Steve4Physics

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
277
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
25
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
24
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
28
Views
448
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
236
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
38
Views
617
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
272
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
317
Back
Top