- #1
art pletcher
- 6
- 0
If you had your choice of any three of the world's most qualified cosmologists, or astrophysicists, to review your manuscript, which three would you choose? Thank you. :)
An astrophysicist should have a PhD in astrophysics, with a strong background in the specific field of the manuscript. They should also have a track record of publishing their own research in reputable scientific journals.
You can search for astrophysicists who have published similar research to your manuscript and reach out to them directly. Additionally, you can ask for recommendations from colleagues or consult with scientific organizations or societies within the field of astrophysics.
While it is preferable for the astrophysicist to have expertise in the same subfield as the manuscript, they can still provide valuable insights and feedback from a different perspective. However, it is important to ensure that the astrophysicist has a solid understanding of the subject matter and methodology used in the manuscript.
The length of time for a review can vary depending on the complexity of the manuscript and the availability of the astrophysicist. On average, it can take anywhere from a few weeks to a few months for a thorough review to be completed.
Yes, you can request a specific astrophysicist to review your manuscript. However, it is important to keep in mind that they may not be available or willing to review at the time of your request. It is recommended to have a list of potential reviewers in case your first choice is unavailable.