What is the D'Alembert operator

[SeReNiTy]

I've seen two different textbooks write two different expressions for this, what is the proper D'Alembert Operator?

 

[robphy]

It's the wave operator
[tex]\square = \left[-\frac{\partial^2}{\partial t^2} + \nabla^2 \right] [/tex], written in rectangular coordinates, that appears in the wave-equation. Some write [tex]\square^2 [/tex] and some write it with an overall opposite sign.

See "[URL .

 

[SeReNiTy]

It's the wave operator
[tex]\square = \left[-\frac{\partial^2}{\partial t^2} + \nabla^2 \right] [/tex], written in rectangular coordinates, that appears in the wave-equation. Some write [tex]\square^2 [/tex] and some write it with an overall opposite sign.

See "[URL .

I write the sqaured version but with a 1/(c^2) factor in it, so the sqaured operator is the same as the unsqaured one?

 

[robphy]

Oops, I left off the wave speed (which is sometimes absorbed into the variables for convenience)
[tex]\square = \left[-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial t^2} + \nabla^2 \right] [/tex]. Thanks for pointing that out.

Some write the wave equation
[tex]\left[-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial t^2} + \nabla^2 \right] \phi=0 [/tex]
as
[tex]\square \phi=0 [/tex], and some as [tex]\square^2 \phi=0 [/tex]. It's a notational thing.

 

[masudr]

Just as a side point, it's invariant since

[tex]\square = \partial_\mu \partial^\mu[/tex]