Varitaion on the twin paradox that just doesnt work out for me

In summary, the twin paradox is a problem with how we think about time. The twin that returns through a wormhole has a different proper time than the twin that stays on Earth, even though they are both traveling at the speed of light.
  • #1
Natman3400
3
0
So if you were to take the twin paradox, but make it so instead of the ship turning around and going to earth, the ship bends space through higher dimensions to return to Earth with no movement, what happens then? I'm sure this has been thought up of before, but i can't find an explanation that works out for me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
In all variations of the twin paradox, we assume the age of the twin is the proper time elapsed along his worldline. So define your spacetime metric (this can be curved and includee wormholes etc), define the worldline of each twin. The spacetime metric acts on every point of the worldline of each twin to produce a number, integrate that number along the worldline (there's a minus sign and square root somewhere, but that's a technicality), and you will get the age. This always works if the spacetime is classical and "given" by god as a background spacetime.
 
  • #3
What i am saying is since both Earth and the ship can be considered to be traveling at near the speed of light, won't the ship see Earth as older then itself, and Earth see the ship as older then itself? In this case, what happens?
 
  • #4
Natman3400 said:
What i am saying is since both Earth and the ship can be considered to be traveling at near the speed of light, won't the ship see Earth as older then itself, and Earth see the ship as older then itself? In this case, what happens?

It has nothing to do with traveling near the speed of light. Travelling near the speed of light is frame-dependent, so it's "coordinate" time dilation, not real aging. The twin paradox is about real aging.
 
  • #5
atyy said:
It has nothing to do with traveling near the speed of light. Travelling near the speed of light is frame-dependent, so it's "coordinate" time dilation, not real aging. The twin paradox is about real aging.
Mind explaining abit?
 
  • #6
The motion of a classical particle is described by a curve in spacetime. In situations like the twin paradox, we don't care about the small differences between the motions of different component parts of the same object, so we treat all clocks, humans, spaceships etc., as particles. The motion of each object is then approximately described by a curve in spacetime.

One of the axioms of both SR and GR is that a clock measures the proper time of the curve that represents its motion. The twin paradox is just a scenario where two objects move as described by two different curves with the same endpoints. The standard twin paradox considers two curves in Minkowski spacetime, but if you want to consider another spacetime, that's fine. There is however no spacetime in which two objects are brought together without movement. No matter what coordinate system you're using, one of the objects is moving.

If one of the two twins leaves Earth the usual way, and returns through a wormhole, the curve that describes his motion can have a longer or shorter proper time than it would have had otherwise. Either way, you find that guy's final age by calculating the proper time of the curve that represents his motion.
 
  • #7
Natman3400 said:
since both Earth and the ship can be considered ...
The situation is not symmetric since the spacetime metric is asymmetric.
 
  • #8
The problem is with your requirement for a magical instantaneous return trip.
And no, the problem is not in the "magical" part - we can easily close our eyes and ignore the fact that it can't exist. It is in the "instantaneous" part.

Instantaneous is just not well-defined. Once the traveling twin decides to return, there exist numerous different frames of reference, according to each of which a different point from the other twin's timeline is simultaneous with the traveler's "now". Which one will your magic chose? You can make an arbitrary pick and you will have some arbitrary answer to the question about their ages, but you can't expect us to give you a scientific argument for picking a "correct" one... it is just not well defined.
 
  • #9
I kind of sounds like a proposed mode of time travel done by traveling close to the speed of light near a large gravitational field. The twin that did the sling shot would be younger, but would somehow end up traveling back in time when he arrived at Earth.

Another one was if you could move an end of a wormhole near the speed of light then one end off it would have its time slow, so then you could travel through one end and arrive in another time comeing out of the other. Then if you brought them both together you would end up comeing out of the wormhole before you went in, but then what if you stopped yourself from going in after you had went through the wormhole already?
 

Related to Varitaion on the twin paradox that just doesnt work out for me

1. Why does the twin paradox not work out for me?

The twin paradox may not work out for you due to a misunderstanding of the concept or a lack of understanding of the underlying principles. It is important to fully comprehend the idea of time dilation and the effects of relative motion on time in order to understand the twin paradox.

2. Can you explain why the twin paradox is considered a paradox?

The twin paradox is considered a paradox because it appears to violate the principles of special relativity. According to the theory, time is relative and can be affected by an observer's relative motion. However, in the twin paradox, two twins in different frames of reference experience different amounts of time, which seems contradictory.

3. How does time dilation play a role in the twin paradox?

Time dilation is a key concept in the twin paradox. It states that time moves slower for an object in motion compared to an object at rest. In the case of the twin paradox, one twin is moving at high speeds while the other is stationary, causing a difference in the amount of time experienced by each twin.

4. Is it possible for the twin paradox to be resolved?

Yes, the twin paradox can be resolved by taking into account the concept of acceleration. In the original thought experiment, the twin who stays on Earth is assumed to be in a steady state of motion. However, if the twin on Earth were to accelerate and catch up to the other twin, they would experience the same amount of time, resolving the paradox.

5. How does the twin paradox relate to real-life scenarios?

The twin paradox serves as a thought experiment to better understand the principles of special relativity. However, it does have real-life applications, such as the effects of time dilation on astronauts in space or the use of atomic clocks in GPS systems. It also helps us to understand the concept of time in relation to relative motion and how it can impact our perception of time.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
700
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
35
Views
377
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
4
Replies
115
Views
5K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
70
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
98
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
10
Views
1K
Back
Top