To prove a series of function is bounded

In summary, the proof shows that if each individual function in a sequence is bounded and the sequence converges uniformly to a limit function, then the sequence is also uniformly bounded. This is done by first establishing that the limit function is bounded, and then using the fact that a finite number of functions in the sequence can be bounded by taking the maximum of their individual bounds and adding 2. This ensures that the entire sequence is uniformly bounded.
  • #1
ssh
17
0
Q. If each individual function is bounded and if \(f_n\longrightarrow f \) uniformly on S, then prove that {fn} is uniformly bounded on S.
Proof : Since each fn is bounded implies \(f_n \leq M_n\)
\(\Longrightarrow f_1\leq M_1, f_2 \leq M_2​,\) and so on
If M = max {M1, M2,...Mn } then each term is certainly less than M

Please let me know is this approach right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
ssh said:
Q. If each individual function is bounded and if \(f_n\longrightarrow f \) uniformly on S, then prove that {fn} is uniformly bounded on S.
Proof : Since each fn is bounded implies \(f_n \leq M_n\)
\(\Longrightarrow f_1\leq M_1, f_2 \leq M_2​,\) and so on
If M = max {M1, M2,...Mn } then each term is certainly less than M

Please let me know is this approach right?
When you write M = max {M1, M2,...Mn }, do you mean that M is the max of the bounds of all the functions $f_1, f_2, f_3, \ldots$, or is it just the max of the bounds of the first n functions?

In the first case, if M is the max of the infinite set $\{M_1,M_2,M_3,\ldots\}$, how do you know that it is finite?

In the second case, if M is the max of the finite set $\{M_1,M_2,M_3,\ldots, M_n\}$ (stopping at $n$), you have only proved something about the first $n$ functions, not the whole sequence.

To give a valid proof of this result, you will need to make use of the fact that the sequence of functions converges uniformly to a limit function.
 
  • #3
I found this answer in a books, but its very confusing, can some one explain this to me clearly.

Ans Since \(f_n \longrightarrow f\) there exists N such that

\( \arrowvert f_n(x) - f(x) \arrowvert < \epsilon\) for all n>N and for all x
Mn = 1, 2, ... be non - negative real numbers such that \(\arrowvert f_n(x)\arrowvert \leq M_n, x\in S\), n=1,2,...
Now \( \arrowvert f(x)\arrowvert - \arrowvert f_n(x)\arrowvert \leq \arrowvert f_n(x) - f(x) \arrowvert < 1 x \in S, n<N \)
\(\Longrightarrow \arrowvert f(x) \arrowvert < 1 + \arrowvert f_N0(x) \leq 1 + M_N0 , x \in S\)
this means that f is bounded. it allows follows from the above that for n>N0
\(\arrowvert f_n(x) \arrowvert <1 + \arrowvert f(x) \arrowvert \leq 2 + M_N0\)
let k = max(M1,M2, MN0, 2+MN0)
then \(\arrowvert f_n(x) \arrowvert \leq k, x\in S, n = 1,2,...\)
implies fn is uniformly bounded.

Thanx
 
  • #4
ssh said:
I found this answer in a books, but its very confusing, can some one explain this to me clearly.
It is a correct proof. You just have to unpick it carefully and it all makes perfect sense:
ssh said:
Since \(f_n \longrightarrow f\) there exists N such that

\( \arrowvert f_n(x) - f(x) \arrowvert < \epsilon\) for all n>N and for all x

More accurately, since \(f_n \longrightarrow f\) uniformly, given $\varepsilon>0$ there exists $N$ such that

\( | f_n(x) - f(x)| < \varepsilon\) for all $n> N$ and for all $x$. In particular, if you take $\varepsilon=1$, then there exists $N$ such that

\(\color{red}{ | f_n(x) - f(x)| < 1}\) for all $\color{red}{n> N}$ and for all $\color{red}x$. Choose some $N_0>N$. Then $\color{blue}{| f_{N_0}(x) - f(x)| < 1 }$ for all $x$.

ssh said:
Mn = 1, 2, ... be non - negative real numbers such that \(\arrowvert f_n(x)\arrowvert \leq M_n, x\in S\), n=1,2,...
Now \( \arrowvert f(x)\arrowvert - \arrowvert f_n(x)\arrowvert \leq \arrowvert f_n(x) - f(x) \arrowvert < 1 x \in S, n<N \)
\(\Longrightarrow \arrowvert f(x) \arrowvert < 1 + \arrowvert f_N0(x) \leq 1 + M_N0 , x \in S\)
this means that f is bounded.
We are told that each $f_n$ is bounded, say $|f_n(x)|\leqslant M_n$ for all $x$. In particular, $\color{blue}{|f_{N_0}(x)|\leqslant M_{N_0}}$ for all $x$. Putting the two blue inequalities together and using the triangle inequality, you see that $|f(x)| = |f_{N_0}(x) + (f(x) - f_{N_0}(x))| \leqslant |f_{N_0}(x)| + |f(x) - f_{N_0}(x)| \leqslant M_{N_0}+1.$

Thus $f$ is bounded, with $M_{N_0}+1$ as a bound.

ssh said:
it allows follows from the above that for n>N0
\(\arrowvert f_n(x) \arrowvert <1 + \arrowvert f(x) \arrowvert \leq 2 + M_N0\)
From the red inequality above, and using the triangle inequality again, you know that $|f_n(x)| = |f(x) + (f_n(x) - f(x))| \leqslant |f(x)| + |f_n(x) - f(x)| \leqslant (M_{N_0}+1) + 1 = M_{N_0}+2$ for all $n>N_0$ and for all $x$.

Thus all the functions from $f_{N_0+1}$ onwards are uniformly bounded, with a bound $M_{N_0}+2$. That just leaves a finite number of functions at the start of the sequence. But each of them is individually bounded, and since there is only a finite number of them, we can just take the maximum of all these bounds to get a bound for the entire sequence:
ssh said:
let $k = \max(M_1,M_2,\ldots, M_{N_0}, 2+M_{N_0})$,
then $|f_n(x)| \leqslant k,\ x\in S,\ n = 1,2,...$
implies $\{f_n\}$ is uniformly bounded.
 
Last edited:
  • #5
Thanx now its clear
 

Related to To prove a series of function is bounded

What does it mean for a series of functions to be bounded?

When a series of functions is bounded, it means that the functions in the series do not have values that are too large or too small. In other words, the values of the functions are confined to a specific range.

How do I prove that a series of functions is bounded?

To prove that a series of functions is bounded, you need to show that there exists a number M such that the absolute value of each function in the series is less than or equal to M. This can be done using the definition of a bounded function and mathematical techniques such as limits and inequalities.

What is the importance of proving that a series of functions is bounded?

Proving that a series of functions is bounded is important because it allows us to make statements about the behavior of the functions. For example, if a series of functions is bounded, we can conclude that the functions do not have values that are too large or too small, which can be useful in various applications.

Can a series of unbounded functions still converge?

Yes, a series of unbounded functions can still converge. The concept of boundedness is not directly related to convergence. A series of functions can be unbounded and still converge, as long as the values of the functions approach a finite limit as the independent variable approaches a certain value.

Are there specific techniques for proving that a series of functions is bounded?

Yes, there are specific techniques that can be used to prove that a series of functions is bounded. These techniques include using the definition of bounded functions, using limits and inequalities, and using the properties of specific types of functions, such as polynomials or trigonometric functions.

Similar threads

  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
503
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Math POTW for University Students
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top