Normalizing Vectors and Light in Computer Graphics

In summary, normalizing vectors means scaling them to a length of 1. The normal to a vertex is the normal at a point on a geometry, which can be visualized as a line drawn from the point in the direction of the normal. To calculate vertex normals, calculus is used for parametric surfaces and averaging is used for straight surfaces. These concepts are important for lighting in computer graphics using methods such as the dot product texture operator and normal mapping.
  • #1
Shadow_7
5
0
I am trying to understand how light works in computer graphics. Especially OpenGL 3+. So I was given a paper that says how to calculate light. It says "normalise the vectors
before taking the dot product".How do I normalize vectors and why? I have to compute the normals to a vertex. What is a normal to a vertex? How can I visualise it?
 
Technology news on Phys.org
  • #2
"Normalising a vector" just means rescaling it (i.e. multiply by a scalar) so that the vector's length becomes 1.

I don't understand what "normal to a vertex" could mean. Was that really the language that was used?
 
  • #3
Shadow_7 said:
I am trying to understand how light works in computer graphics. Especially OpenGL 3+. So I was given a paper that says how to calculate light. It says "normalise the vectors
before taking the dot product".How do I normalize vectors and why? I have to compute the normals to a vertex. What is a normal to a vertex? How can I visualise it?

As stated, normalizing vectors means making their length 1. You just divide each component by the length of the vector, and that will give you a unit vector.

In rendering applications, if your texture is RGBA 32-bit, each component of the vector will have 8 bits. This means that the representation will consist of 3 signed 8-bit numbers corresponding to your vector.

Typically when you use the dot product texture operator, you have a texture map which is known as the normal map. When you take the dot product of the normal map with the light normal vector, you get a lightmap for your object which you modulate with your texture map which gives you a texture that shows the effect of a light on that object.

So basically: light direction vector -> texture. From there you use dot product between this texture map and normal map: This will give you a lightmap which you modulate with normal texture map which gives modulated map. You then modulate that usually with another lightmap which gives final texture for object which you use for rendering.

You can do more than this but this is the general idea.

The thing is that this method assumes a directional light source: your lighting source is like say the sun and not something like a lamp or a flashlight: you add more texture operations for this kind of effect.

The normal to a vertex (or vertex normal) is the normal at a point of your geometry.

As an example if you have a parametric surface (Bezier surface), the vertex normal is just the surface normal at that point.

Vertex normals are used for lighting as well, and under the old rendering pipeline, this is how lighting was actually done. It is done in the same sort of way that the normal map does it, but it's done in the vertex pipeline, whereas the normal map computations are done in the fragment (or texture) pipeline.

If you want to visualize a vertex normal, just draw a line of the vertex normal from the point to another short point in the direction of the normal.

In terms of getting the vertex normal, for surfaces like Bezier surfaces or NURBS, you need to use calculus. Essentially you get the tangent and binormal vectors and then take the cross product and normalize the vector.

For straight surfaces it is a little trickier. You have to take into account adjoining edges since these objects are not continuous in the way that parametric surfaces are. You usually average over the normal vectors of adjoining surfaces.
 

Related to Normalizing Vectors and Light in Computer Graphics

1. What is the purpose of normalizing vectors in computer graphics?

Normalizing vectors in computer graphics is important because it allows for consistent lighting and shading calculations. Normalized vectors have a magnitude of 1, which means they represent a direction rather than a specific length. This is necessary for accurate lighting calculations and creating realistic images.

2. How is a vector normalized in computer graphics?

To normalize a vector in computer graphics, you divide each component of the vector by its magnitude. The magnitude of a vector can be calculated using the Pythagorean theorem (sqrt(x^2 + y^2 + z^2)). This will result in a vector with a magnitude of 1, representing a direction rather than a specific length.

3. Why is it important to normalize light vectors in computer graphics?

Normalizing light vectors in computer graphics is important because it ensures that the light source is at a consistent distance from the object being rendered. This allows for accurate lighting calculations and prevents the object from appearing too bright or too dark.

4. What is the difference between normalizing vectors and normalizing light in computer graphics?

Normalizing vectors is the process of making a vector have a magnitude of 1, while normalizing light in computer graphics refers to adjusting the intensity of light to account for distance from the light source. Normalized vectors are used for accurate lighting calculations, while normalizing light ensures consistent lighting and shading in a rendered image.

5. Can vectors other than light vectors be normalized in computer graphics?

Yes, any vector can be normalized in computer graphics. The process involves dividing each component of the vector by its magnitude to obtain a vector with a magnitude of 1. Normalized vectors are commonly used for lighting and shading calculations, but can also be used for other purposes such as determining surface normals for 3D objects.

Similar threads

  • Programming and Computer Science
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • Programming and Computer Science
Replies
1
Views
966
  • Programming and Computer Science
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
48
Views
4K
  • Programming and Computer Science
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • Programming and Computer Science
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Programming and Computer Science
Replies
3
Views
636
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • Programming and Computer Science
2
Replies
52
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top