New Theory of Spacetime: Is Time the 4th Dimension?

In summary, the article discusses a new theory that claims time is not the fourth dimension and that there is no absolute time, which aligns with special relativity. The article also mentions the possibility of including philosophy in this theory, but it is not clear if this is a valid addition.
  • #1
[Quadratic]
59
3
http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2011/04/spacetime-has-no-time-dimension-new-theory-claims-that-time-is-not-the-4th-dimension.html

I'm sorry for being so clueless, but isn't that article basically saying exactly what special relativity said in the first place? That there is no absolute time? It seems to me that the science is more or less the same, but with the addition of dopey philosophy.

Thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Yes, allowing for the fact that this is a newspaper or magazine popularization of what was said, rather than was actually said, that appears to be exactly what happened- they are just rephrasing the theory of relativity. Of course if a (locally) well known scientist were to announce that "2+ 2= 4", the (local) newspapers would jump all over it.
 

Related to New Theory of Spacetime: Is Time the 4th Dimension?

1. What is the New Theory of Spacetime?

The New Theory of Spacetime is a scientific theory that proposes time as the fourth dimension of the universe, in addition to the three dimensions of space (length, width, and height). This theory suggests that time is not a separate entity, but rather an integral part of the fabric of the universe.

2. How does the New Theory of Spacetime differ from previous theories?

The New Theory of Spacetime challenges the traditional notion of time as a linear, unidirectional concept. It proposes that time is a dynamic dimension that is influenced by gravity and other forces, and that it can be manipulated and distorted by the presence of massive objects. This theory also suggests that the past, present, and future all coexist simultaneously, rather than being separate and distinct.

3. What evidence supports the New Theory of Spacetime?

The New Theory of Spacetime is supported by various scientific observations and experiments, including the measurement of time dilation near massive objects, the bending of light due to gravity, and the discovery of gravitational waves. Additionally, this theory is supported by the principles of relativity and quantum mechanics, which have been extensively tested and proven.

4. Can the New Theory of Spacetime be applied practically?

While the New Theory of Spacetime is still a subject of ongoing research and debate, it has the potential to revolutionize our understanding of the universe and lead to practical applications. For example, this theory could help us better understand and predict the behavior of black holes, develop more accurate GPS systems, and even potentially enable time travel in the future.

5. What are the implications of the New Theory of Spacetime for our understanding of the universe?

The New Theory of Spacetime has significant implications for our understanding of the universe, as it challenges our perception of time and its role in the fabric of reality. It also raises questions about the nature of causality and free will, and could potentially lead to a more unified understanding of the laws of physics. However, further research and experimentation are needed to fully grasp the implications of this theory.

Similar threads

Block Universe Theory: Implications & Multiverse
    • Special and General Relativity
Replies
6
Views
2K
B "Spacetime Physics" by Taylor and Wheeler
    • Special and General Relativity
Replies
32
Views
4K
A "Monstrous Higgs and Leech Spacetime"
    • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
0
Views
1K
Spacetime has No Time Dimension
    • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
20
Views
8K
I Trying To Conceptualize Two Dimensions Of Time
    • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
2
Views
2K
B Gisin's ideas on time vs. special relativity—how does one reconcile them?
    • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
36
Views
2K
B Why is Lorentz Ether Theory Hard to Rule Out?
    • Special and General Relativity
Replies
15
Views
2K
I Unruh, Haag et al.: No Room for Particles in Quantum Field Theory?
    • Quantum Physics
Replies
12
Views
2K
Exploring Minkowski Space: Understanding Special Theory of Relativity
    • Special and General Relativity
Replies
28
Views
5K
A Spacetime Engineering by Superposition of GWs: Feasible in Theory?
    • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top