Is the objectivity of math assessment testing a myth?

[swampwiz]

https://peterliljedahl.com/wp-content/uploads/Myth-of-Objectivity-2.pdf

 

[hutchphd]

There is no testing that is not subjective.

 

[pbuk]

Is the objectivity of math assessment testing a myth?

No, it's a straw man because

There is no testing that is not subjective.

Anyway, why should anyone be interested in someone's 20 year old opinion paper?

 

[Vanadium 50]

Why should anyone be interested in someone's 20 year old opinion paper?

And if the OP feels it is not worth his time to summarize the paper and tell us what point he is trying to make, why is it worth my time to read it? It put it in the same category as "Here's a four-hour YouTuvbe video. Explain it to me."

 

[Mark44]

Anyway, why should anyone be interested in someone's 20 year old opinion paper?

This...

And if the OP feels it is noty worth his time to summarize the paper and tell us what point he is trying to make, why is it worth my time to read it?

... and this.

@swampwiz, please don't post links with no additional commentary by you.

 

[kuruman]

Perhaps threads of this ilk ought to be treated like homework: to get our help/opinion, you must first tell us what you think.

 

[haushofer]

Is this question in the context of Liljedahl's Building Thinking Classrooms?