Induction vs electromagnetic repulsion: which is more efficient?

In summary, the conversation is about the most efficient method of levitating an object, either through electromagnetic induction or the repulsion between a magnet and electromagnet. It is noted that Earnshaw's law may complicate matters, but for the purposes of the conversation, it will be ignored. The possibility of producing a repulsive force through induction without movement of the electromagnet and conductor is also discussed, with the conclusion that eddy-current repulsion is possible in this scenario. A link to more information on eddy current repulsion is provided and it is also noted that an axial force cannot be produced on a conducting ring unless the magnetic field has a gradient.
  • #1
MaJiK9021
4
0
Hi, I am curious about the most efficient method of levitating an object. I am considering using electromagnetic induction or the repulsion between a magnet and electromagnet. Which would require less energy? Also I am aware of Earnshaw's law; let's ignore the complexities it causes for now.

Also, is it possible to produce a repulsive force through induction, if the electromagnet is not moving in relation to the conductor? Say, if the electromagnet and the conductor are fixed in spot, but the electromagnet has an alternating magnetic field.

Any help would be appreciated.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
MaJiK9021 said:
Also, is it possible to produce a repulsive force through induction, if the electromagnet is not moving in relation to the conductor? Say, if the electromagnet and the conductor are fixed in spot, but the electromagnet has an alternating magnetic field.
Yes, eddy-current repulsion is possible whenever there is a conducting loop or plate in a dB/dt field (Faraday's law). The induced currents are replused by the magnetic field (Lorentz force). It is sometimes used in circuit breakers, for example.
Bob S
[edit] See section on eddy current repulsion in
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eddy_current
[edit] There cannot be an axial force on a conducting ring with azimuthal induced currents unless the magnetic field has an r component (i.e., has a dB/dz gradient).
 
Last edited:
  • #3


Both electromagnetic induction and electromagnetic repulsion can be efficient methods for levitating an object, but the most efficient method will depend on various factors such as the size and weight of the object, the distance it needs to be levitated, and the availability of energy sources.

In terms of energy usage, electromagnetic induction would generally require less energy as it involves the creation of a magnetic field through the movement of a conductor, rather than the constant use of energy to maintain a repulsive force between two magnets. However, this also depends on the strength and efficiency of the electromagnet used in the repulsive method.

Regarding the possibility of producing a repulsive force through induction without the movement of the electromagnet, it is possible but not as efficient. This is because the alternating magnetic field would need to be strong enough to continuously induce a current in the conductor, which would require a significant amount of energy.

In conclusion, both methods have their advantages and limitations, and the most efficient method will depend on the specific circumstances and requirements. It is also important to consider the limitations of Earnshaw's law before implementing any levitation method.
 

Related to Induction vs electromagnetic repulsion: which is more efficient?

1. What is the difference between induction and electromagnetic repulsion?

Induction and electromagnetic repulsion are two different phenomena that involve the interaction of electricity and magnetism. Induction is the process of generating an electric current in a conductor by moving a magnet near it, while electromagnetic repulsion is the force between two electrically charged objects that causes them to push away from each other.

2. Which is more efficient, induction or electromagnetic repulsion?

The efficiency of induction and electromagnetic repulsion depends on the specific application and circumstances. In general, induction is more efficient for generating electricity, while electromagnetic repulsion is more efficient for creating motion or force.

3. How do induction and electromagnetic repulsion work?

Induction works by using a changing magnetic field to induce an electric current in a conductor, while electromagnetic repulsion is caused by the interaction of electric charges. In both cases, the movement of charged particles (electrons in induction, and charged objects in electromagnetic repulsion) is key to understanding how they work.

4. What are some examples of induction and electromagnetic repulsion in everyday life?

Induction is used in many common devices such as generators, transformers, and induction cooktops. Electromagnetic repulsion is used in electromagnets, electric motors, and lightning rods. It is also the force behind the movement of electrons in circuits, which powers many of our electronic devices.

5. Can induction and electromagnetic repulsion be used together?

Yes, induction and electromagnetic repulsion can be used together in certain applications. For example, a generator uses both induction and electromagnetic repulsion to convert mechanical energy into electrical energy. Electromagnetic repulsion can also be used to control the speed and direction of an induction motor.

Similar threads

  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
845
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
5
Views
804
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
15
Views
1K
Back
Top