Gravitational constant for normalized masses

In summary, the conversation discusses the use of a simple orbital model of the sun and earth, where the masses and distances are normalized to simplify calculations. The conversation then moves on to calculating the exact value for the gravitational constant in the chosen system of units. The expert summarizer provides information on how to convert from kilograms to the mass of the sun and how the mass of the Earth does not affect the calculation. Finally, the expert summarizes the final solution for the value of the gravitational constant in the chosen system of units.
  • #1
Serotonindude
5
1
hi,
i'm totally confused right now. I'm playing around with a simple orbital model of the sun and the earth. since my rigid body solver doesn't like the huge masses of those bodies, i just normalized the masses to those of the sun. so i have m_sun = 1 and m_earth=3.0044e-6 as dimensionless numbers. also i reduced the distances to dimensionless numbers by dividing the real ones by 1 million km. so e.g. i got about r_earth = 149. accordingly I've divided the velocity by 1 million km to match it and multiplied it again by 1 million to speed things up. so i got a speed of about v=29/s (which comes from 29km/s). of course all this stuff are actually 3d vectors, i just gave you the magnitudes here for simplification.

stuff works fine so far. but of course my gravitational constant now got changed. by trying around i found that it is somewhere near G_mine = 132200. this keeps the radius of the Earth between 147 and 151.
so my gravitational law looks like: F = G_mine * m1 * m2 / r², which in my case is about F = 132200 * 1 * 3.0044e-6 / (149)²

now i wanted to calculate the exact value for G_mine. and that's where i got stucked. i thought i should get the right number (maybe not the magnitude) by just using m_earth=3.0044e-006 and maybe the actual value for G (6.674e-11). i ignored my changes to the distances, since they are multiples of 10 and even if squared they should just change the magnitude of G_mine (e.g. if i enhance the speed even more by 10, i got to multiply G_mine by 100 because the energy is proportional to the square of the speed, which works nicely). anyway, i don't seem to be able to get where i want.

any ideas what I'm overlooking here?
kind regards
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Serotonindude said:
now i wanted to calculate the exact value for G_mine. and that's where i got stucked. i thought i should get the right number (maybe not the magnitude) by just using m_earth=3.0044e-006 and maybe the actual value for G (6.674e-11).
When you changed the mass units from kilograms to the mass of the sun, that is not a change by a factor of 3.044 x 10-6 but instead by a larger factor.

What is the mass of the sun in kilograms?
 
  • #3
5.974 · 10^24 kg / 1.9884 · 10^30 kg = 3.044 · 10^-6
think 3 million is still enough :)
 
  • #4
Serotonindude said:
5.974 · 10^24 kg / 1.9884 · 10^30 kg = 3.044 · 10^-6
think 3 million is still enough :)
What possible use is the number you just computed? How does it relate to the question that I asked?
 
  • #5
how do i reply to an answer?
anyway, it's the ratio of the Earth's mass to the sun's mass... it is indeed in this order of magnitude... m_earth = 5.974 · 10^24 kg / m_sun = 1.9884 · 10^30 kg = 3.044 · 10^-6 ...
it's the normalized masses I've used...
 
  • #6
Serotonindude said:
how do i reply to an answer?
anyway, it's the ratio of the Earth's mass to the sun's mass... it is indeed in this order of magnitude... m_earth = 5.974 · 10^24 kg / m_sun = 1.9884 · 10^30 kg = 3.044 · 10^-6 ...
it's the normalized masses I've used...
Newton's Universal gravitational constant, "G" is normally posed in terms of kilograms, meters and seconds. That is where the figure that you quoted for G (6.674 x 10-11)" came from. That constant has that numeric value in that system of units. Change to another system of units and the numeric value for G will change. You seem to understand this.

The system of units that you have chosen to use is one in which the the unit of mass is 1 solar mass. In order to convert from a system of units in which the unit of mass is 1 kilogram to a system of units in which the unit of mass is 1 solar mass, the conversion factor for mass is what?

If you want to update the numeric value of G to compensate for the change in mass units, does the mass of the Earth enter in?
 
  • Like
Likes Serotonindude
  • #7
jbriggs444 said:
Newton's Universal gravitational constant, "G" is normally posed in terms of kilograms, meters and seconds. That is where the figure that you quoted for G (6.674 x 10-11)" came from. That constant has that numeric value in that system of units. Change to another system of units and the numeric value for G will change. You seem to understand this.

The system of units that you have chosen to use is one in which the the unit of mass is 1 solar mass. In order to convert from a system of units in which the unit of mass is 1 kilogram to a system of units in which the unit of mass is 1 solar mass, the conversion factor for mass is what?

If you want to update the numeric value of G to compensate for the change in mass units, does the mass of the Earth enter in?

Well the conversion factor should be 1 solar mass in kilogram... so 1.9884 · 10^30 kg ... mass of Earth shouldn't enter the conversion, since it's just another mass (which needs to be converted as well of course, but it has nothing to do with G). So actually it should be G_mine = G * m_sun = 6.67408e-11m³/(kg*s²) * 1.9884 · 10^30 kg = 1.3271e+020 m³/s² ... which is the value i was looking for! :) Of course i also have to compensate for my length conversions, but this is no problem now ;)

Thank you very much... Sometimes a little push by someone else is already enough :)
 
  • Like
Likes jbriggs444
  • #8
jbriggs444 said:
When you changed the mass units from kilograms to the mass of the sun, that is not a change by a factor of 3.044 x 10-6 but instead by a larger factor.

What is the mass of the sun in kilograms?

ah! now i understand that first question of yours in the right way! yeah, there was already the answer in there, i just didn't get it at that time.
 

Related to Gravitational constant for normalized masses

1. What is the value of the gravitational constant for normalized masses?

The value of the gravitational constant for normalized masses, also known as the universal gravitational constant, is approximately 6.674 x 10^-11 m^3/kg/s^2. This value is a fundamental constant in physics and is used to calculate the force of gravity between two objects.

2. How is the gravitational constant determined for normalized masses?

The gravitational constant is determined through experiments and observations of the gravitational force between two objects with known masses and distances. These experiments involve precise measurements and calculations to determine the value of the constant.

3. Why is the gravitational constant important for normalized masses?

The gravitational constant is important because it helps us understand and predict the behavior of objects in the universe. It is used in many equations and theories, such as Newton's law of universal gravitation and Einstein's theory of general relativity.

4. Does the gravitational constant vary for different masses and distances?

No, the gravitational constant is a universal constant that does not vary for different masses and distances. It is the same value for all objects in the universe and is a fundamental property of space and time.

5. Can the gravitational constant be changed or manipulated?

No, the gravitational constant is a physical constant that cannot be changed or manipulated. It is a fundamental property of the universe and is not affected by external factors.

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
270
  • Classical Physics
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
1
Views
887
Replies
4
Views
846
Replies
86
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
921
Replies
1
Views
367
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
6
Views
931
Back
Top