Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster

  • Fukushima
  • Thread starter Bryan 1
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Nuclear
None. Overall, bombarding the reactors at the Fukushima power plant with alpha particles, protons, neutrons, or electrons would not solve the problem and would only create more issues. The only way to potentially use radiation to reduce the radioactivity would be to separate the dangerous elements from the less dangerous ones, but this would be a difficult and complex process. Additionally, the main issue at the moment is the presence of Caesium-137, which does not absorb neutrons well and would not be affected by this bombardment. In summary, bombarding the reactors with radiation would not be a viable solution to the problem at Fukushima.
  • #1
Bryan 1
Is it possible to bombard the reactors at the Fukushima power plant with alpha particles and or protons, and or neutrons and or electrons in a combination that would alter the radioactivity presently being admitted by the failed reactors
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
Possible? Sure, why not. Technically viable - no. It would create tons of new problems on top of those we already have.
 
  • #3
Bryan 1 said:
Is it possible to bombard the reactors at the Fukushima power plant with alpha particles and or protons, and or neutrons and or electrons in a combination that would alter the radioactivity presently being admitted by the failed reactors

Not to make anything better. The only kind of radiation that would do anything is neutrons. Alpha particles and electrons won't penetrate into any material. If you want to transmute anything with them you need tiny samples in vacuum. This is useless here.

If you want to irrediate anything with neutrons, you will have to separate the stuff that will get more dangerous from the stuff that will get less dangerous. Unfortunately there is far more stuff that will become more dangerous than less dangerous. Firing neutrons at the remaining nuclear fuel will produce more fission products and plutonium. You would need to separate all the radiactive elements, and if you had done that you would already have solved the problem

Transmutation of nuclear waste seems only to make sense for transuranic elements, which you could let fission in a reactor to form fission products, which will be much shorter lived. The main problem at this time is Caesium-137. Unfortunately it doesn't absorb neutrons well. It will collect over a few years in a nuclear reactor after all. Firing neutrons at a swimming pool of mostly water with a bit of 137Cs in it isn't useful.
 
  • Like
Likes Bandersnatch
  • #4
Bryan 1 said:
that would alter the radioactivity presently being admitted by the failed reactors

Sure. The alteration would make everything more radioactive. What is the benefit of that?
 

Related to Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster

1. What caused the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster?

The disaster was caused by a powerful earthquake and subsequent tsunami on March 11, 2011 in Japan. The tsunami caused extensive damage to the nuclear power plant, leading to multiple meltdowns and releases of radioactive material.

2. How much radiation was released during the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster?

It is estimated that the disaster released approximately 940 PBq (petabecquerels) of radioactive material into the atmosphere, making it one of the largest nuclear accidents in history.

3. What were the immediate and long-term impacts of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster?

The immediate impact was the evacuation of over 150,000 people from the surrounding areas to prevent exposure to the released radiation. The long-term impacts include health effects on the local population, contamination of land and water, and economic and social consequences for the affected communities.

4. Has the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant been cleaned up?

Efforts to clean up and decommission the nuclear power plant are ongoing. However, due to the high levels of radiation, it is a complex and time-consuming process that is expected to take several decades to complete.

5. What measures have been taken to prevent a similar disaster from happening in the future?

The Japanese government has implemented stricter safety regulations for nuclear power plants, including regular safety inspections and upgrades to withstand natural disasters. International organizations have also conducted safety reviews and provided recommendations for improving nuclear safety worldwide.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
947
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top