- #1
Epcious
- 7
- 0
There are those who argue for free will, those for determinism, and others for a mixture. I argue that there is no free will or determinism. Is such a ground of mine possible?
Epcious said:There are those who argue for free will, those for determinism, and others for a mixture. I argue that there is no free will or determinism. Is such a ground of mine possible?
Epcious said:There are those who argue for free will, those for determinism, and others for a mixture. I argue that there is no free will or determinism. Is such a ground of mine possible?
Epcious said:Statusx,
Just because science is incapable of prediction does not mean their is no order. It just indicates that their methodology is incapable of prediction. It simple means that physics fails to understand reality and its nature because the science is based on incorrect grounds and follow an incorrect system.
You probably do not notice that science is destroying itself. It is having to resort to ideas that are really contradicting and putting into challenge the foundations and systematics that scienc stands upon. Hell, Hume already knew of the errors and provided some grounds that destroyed the basis of causality, probability, and induction.
Science will eventually find out point in which the problems lead to a neccesity of choosing explanations that contradict and therefore destroy the foundations of science itself. It is already occurring and has been occurring since the influx of relativist ideas naturally adopted from Kant and his contemparies. Einstein himself got his relativism from Kant.
Epcious said:I am asking is the position valid in the first place, if not then there is no use in arguing for or against it.
Epcious said:There are those who argue for free will, those for determinism, and others for a mixture. I argue that there is no free will or determinism. Is such a ground of mine possible?
Free will is the belief that individuals have the ability to make choices and decisions that are not determined by any external factors. Determinism, on the other hand, argues that all events, including human actions, are predetermined by a chain of cause and effect.
Yes, there is a third option known as compatibilism. This perspective suggests that free will and determinism can coexist, as long as individuals have the ability to make choices based on their own desires and beliefs, even if those desires and beliefs are influenced by external factors.
No, neither free will nor determinism can be scientifically proven. These are philosophical concepts that cannot be tested or measured using scientific methods. They are based on personal beliefs and interpretations of the world.
Believing in free will can lead to a sense of personal responsibility and accountability for one's actions. On the other hand, determinism can lead to a sense of fatalism, where individuals may feel that their actions are predetermined and they have no control over their lives.
Yes, a person's belief in free will or determinism can change over time based on personal experiences, new information, and cultural influences. It is also possible for an individual to hold both beliefs simultaneously, depending on the situation or context.