Entanglement inside a black hole

In summary, the paradox is that Assistant #1 can measure + and also see the Assistant #2 measure +. Hence, he observes that the entanglement was severed by the BH event horizon.
  • #1
Kostik
93
9
TL;DR Summary
A thought experiment involving measuring the spins of entangled electrons.
Suppose two electrons are entangled with opposite spins. Electron #1 passes through the event horizon of a black hole, together with Laboratory Assistant #1. Suppose the assistant measures electron #1's spin after they pass through the event horizon (according to #1's [proper] time) and measures a + spin.

Another laboratory assistant, #2, outside the black hole, watches the Assistant #1 falling into the black hole, but #2 never sees #1 cross the event horizon. After a time, suppose Assistance #2 measure the spin of electron #2. He measures + or −.
If Assistant #2 measures +, then electron #1 must be −. And yet, Assistant #1 (in his proper time) already measured +!

It seems to me the "answer" is probably that when #1 makes his measurement inside the BH, he is no longer within the same spacetime as #2. He is not in #2's universe. Hence, the entanglement is effectively severed once #1 enters the BH (which #2 never sees), since #2 has no access to #1's spacetime.

Therefore, both electrons can have a spin measurement of +.

Assistant #2 never sees #1's measurement, so the issue here is meaningless to him. The interior of the BH is not in #1's spacetime.

HOWEVER, Assistant #1 can see #2's measurement, especially if he has a long time to relax and wait before reaching the BH singularity. #1 can measure +, and then after a while he can observe that #2 also measured +. Therefore, #1 can witness that the entanglement was broken.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Kostik said:
How to understand this?
Your black hole is just a more complicated way of setting up an experiment which has been done many times: the two measurements are spacelike-separated so there is no unambiguous way of saying which one happened first. The resolution of your apparent paradox is also the same: Entanglement doesn’t work the way you’re thinking.

Measuring the spin of one particle does not somehow set the spin of the other particle. When I measure one particle and get spin up, that just means that I know that when and if the other particle is measured (and for all I know that’s already happened) it will be spin down. It doesn’t matter which measurement is first.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes phinds, Vanadium 50 and Dale
  • #3
Nugatory said:
Your black hole is just a more complicated way of setting up an experiment in which has been done many times: the two measurements are spacelike-separated so there is no unambiguous way of saying which one happened first. The resolution of your apparent paradox is also the same: Entanglement doesn’t work the way you’re thinking.

Measuring the spin of one particle does not somehow set the spin of the other particle. When I measure one particle and get spin up, that just means that I know that when and if the other particle is measured (and for all I know that’s already happened) it will be spin down. It doesn’t matter which measurement is first.
It’s not just a spacelike separation scenario. I outlined a scenario where both spins are measured with the same direction. Observer #2 never sees #1 make a measurement.
 
  • #4
Kostik said:
It’s not just a spacelike separation scenario. I outlined a scenario where both spins are measured with the same direction. Observer #2 never sees #1 make a measurement.
It is still just a spacelike separation scenario.

Kostik said:
If assistant #2 measures +, then electron #1 must be -. And yet, assistant #1 (in his proper time) already measured +.
This cannot happen according to our current theories. And we don’t have any experimental evidence contradicting the theory for this scenario
 
  • #5
But it can easily happen. It seems to me the "answer" is probably that when #1 makes his measurement, he is no longer within the same spacetime as #2. He is not in #2's universe. Hence, the entanglement is effectively severed once #1 is inside the BH, since #2 has no access to #1's spacetime.
 
  • Sad
Likes Dale
  • #6
Kostik said:
It’s not just a spacelike separation scenario. I outlined a scenario where both spins are measured with the same direction. Observer #2 never sees #1 make a measurement.
You are just repeating your original misunderstanding. In all of these entanglement situations, it is does not matter whether either observer sees the other’s measurement.
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50
  • #7
Of course it does not matter, except if both spins turns out to be the same.
 
  • #8
Why did you ask the question if you don't want to know the answer? Seems like you just want to argue, not learn.
 
  • Like
Likes Dale, Vanadium 50 and weirdoguy
  • #9
The paradox seems to be how Assistant #1 can measure + and also see the Assistant #2 measure +. Hence, he observes that the entanglement was severed by the BH event horizon.
 
  • Sad
Likes Dale
  • #10
Kostik said:
The paradox
is all in your head
 
  • #11
Hoping for a more useful reply.
 
  • #12
Kostik said:
Hoping for a more useful reply.
What could be more useful than being told where the mistake is?
 
  • Like
Likes Motore and phinds
  • #13
Vanadium 50 said:
What could be more useful than being told where the mistake is?
Read the answers you've already gotten.
 
  • #14
Kostik said:
But it can easily happen.
As said above, this has never been observed. Our current best understanding of the universe says it can't happen.

Kostik said:
It seems to me the "answer" is probably that when #1 makes his measurement, he is no longer within the same spacetime as #2. He is not in #2's universe. Hence, the entanglement is effectively severed once #1 is inside the BH, since #2 has no access to #1's spacetime.
We do not allow personal speculation. Thread closed.
 
  • #15
Kostik said:
when #1 makes his measurement, he is no longer within the same spacetime as #2
This is wrong. The entire black hole, interior and exterior, is a single spacetime.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
673
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
4
Views
689
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
846
Replies
1
Views
868
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
41
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Back
Top