Deriving EOM of cantilever beam using specific Lagrangian

In summary, the specific Lagrangian for a cantilever beam is given by a combination of mass and bending stiffness terms. The question is how to differentiate with respect to the angular velocity, which is found using a tangent function. The attempt at a solution involves taking the partial derivative of the Lagrangian and using the chain rule to solve for the desired derivative, which ultimately results in a value of 0.
  • #1
JasonMech
5
0

Homework Statement


The specific Lagrangian for a cantilever beam is given by:

[tex]
\overline{L}=\frac{1}{2}m[\dot{u}^2(s,t)+\dot{v}^2(s,t)]-\frac{1}{2}EI[\psi ^{\prime}(s,t)]^2
[/tex]

where [itex] m,EI [/itex] are mass and bending stifness, respectively. [itex] \dot{u},\dot{v} [/itex] are velocities in [itex] u,v [/itex] directions. [itex] \psi^{\prime} [/itex] is the angular velocity, found via:
[tex]
\tan \psi = \frac{v^{\prime}}{1+u^{\prime}}
[/tex]

and where [itex] s,t [/itex] are position and time. Prime and dot refers to differentiation wrt. position and time, respectively.

Homework Equations



The question is: how do you differentiate wrt. [itex] \psi [/itex]? That is, what is [itex] \frac{\partial \overline{L}}{\partial \psi} [/itex]?

The Attempt at a Solution



To me, it should be trivial (=0) but it seems not to be the case (since an article postulates it differently - but I cannot see where I go wrong!? It's probably basic math? Help would be appreciated a bunch!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
My attempt:\frac{\partial \overline{L}}{\partial \psi}=\frac{\partial}{\partial \psi}\left(\frac{1}{2}m[\dot{u}^2(s,t)+\dot{v}^2(s,t)]-\frac{1}{2}EI[\psi ^{\prime}(s,t)]^2\right)\\=\frac{\partial}{\partial \psi}\left(\frac{1}{2}m[\dot{u}^2(s,t)+\dot{v}^2(s,t)]\right)-\frac{\partial}{\partial \psi}\left(\frac{1}{2}EI[\psi ^{\prime}(s,t)]^2\right)\\=0-EI\cdot2\psi^{\prime}(s,t)\cdot\frac{\partial \psi^{\prime}(s,t)}{\partial \psi}\\=0-EI\cdot2\psi^{\prime}(s,t)\cdot\frac{\partial}{\partial \psi}\left(\frac{v^{\prime}}{1+u^{\prime}}\right)\\=0-EI\cdot2\psi^{\prime}(s,t)\cdot\left(-\frac{v^{\prime\prime}}{(1+u^{\prime})^2}\right)=0
 

Related to Deriving EOM of cantilever beam using specific Lagrangian

1. What is a cantilever beam?

A cantilever beam is a type of structural element that is supported at only one end, with the other end projecting out freely. It is commonly used in construction and engineering for various applications, such as bridges, balconies, and roof supports.

2. What is a specific Lagrangian?

A specific Lagrangian is a mathematical function used in the Lagrangian mechanics approach to analyze the motion of a system. It takes into account the kinetic and potential energy of a system, and is used to derive the equations of motion for the system.

3. How is a cantilever beam's EOM derived using specific Lagrangian?

The EOM (equations of motion) for a cantilever beam can be derived using specific Lagrangian by applying the principles of Lagrangian mechanics. This involves considering the beam as a system of particles with kinetic and potential energy, and using the specific Lagrangian to calculate the Lagrangian function. From there, the Euler-Lagrange equations can be applied to obtain the EOM for the cantilever beam.

4. Why is it important to derive the EOM of a cantilever beam?

Deriving the EOM of a cantilever beam is important in order to understand and predict its behavior and response to external forces. This information is crucial in designing and analyzing the structural integrity and stability of the cantilever beam in various applications.

5. Are there any limitations to using the specific Lagrangian approach for deriving EOM of a cantilever beam?

While the specific Lagrangian approach is a powerful tool for analyzing the motion of systems, it may not be suitable for all types of cantilever beams. For more complex systems, other methods such as FEM (finite element method) may be more appropriate. Additionally, the specific Lagrangian approach assumes a linear elastic behavior, which may not accurately represent the behavior of certain materials under large deformations.

Similar threads

  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
653
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
0
Views
758
Replies
2
Views
321
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
270
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
374
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
9K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top