Converting GD&T to BD&T for Mil Spec Design - Seeking Help and Suggestions

  • Thread starter Stevecgz
  • Start date
In summary, the person is trying to design a part using solidworks and is having difficulty converting the dimensions from GD&T to BD&T. They are looking for help or suggestions on how to convert the tolerances.
  • #1
Stevecgz
68
0
Now that I've completed my first CAE course I'm attempting to design a part (to actually have built) using solidworks. I'm want to build this part to mil spec, problem is mil specs are given in GD&T and I only know BD&T.

I've been trying to convert the GD&T to BD&T so I can dimension and tolerance the part, but I haven't been having much sucess. I've even considered simply giving the machist the actual mil spec document (and letting him decifer it), but I would at least like to have the dimensions correct on my model.

So I'm looking for any help or suggestions about how to deal with this situation, or how to convert GD&T into BD&T. I would even be willing to pay if someone would take the time to do to conversions for me. It's a fairly simple design, and I'm sure it wouldn't take someone who knows GD&T very long to do.

To give you a better idea of what I'm working with I've attached a picture of my model so far, it is a handgaurd for a rifle. Also, here is a link to the mil specs (specifically for the rails): http://www.biggerhammer.net/picatinny/"

Thanks
 

Attachments

  • rail.jpg
    rail.jpg
    25.8 KB · Views: 445
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
Well, with any tolerancing scheme, we have to understand the role and function of the part. What are the important characteristics? I could GDT this thing until I am blue in the face and make the cost per part about a million and a half bucks.

I guess it would help if you gave us some ideas about the current tolerancing.

Do you have access to ASME Y14.5?
 
Last edited:
  • #3
No, I don't have access to ASME Y14.5. I thought my school library would have it but a quick search revelaed nothing.

I'm trying to tolerance the whole part as BD&T, not GD&T, so for most of the part I already know the tolerances I want and how to apply them. My issue is specifically about the "rails". Looking at the picture the rails are the four longitudional sections that at located at the top, bottom, and sides of the part.

To dimension and tolerance these rails I have found the military specifications for them, as linked to in my previous post. I think I have been able to convert the dimensions from GD&T to BD&T, but I am uncertain how to convert the tolerances.

So I know the tolerancing I want (mil spec) I just am uncertain how to convert the tolerancing from GD&T and BD&T.
 
  • #4
Do you understand the concepts behind the true position tolerance? Do you know the implications of having the max material condition symbol on the tolerance?
 
  • #5
FredGarvin said:
Do you understand the concepts behind the true position tolerance? Do you know the implications of having the max material condition symbol on the tolerance?

No, I do not.
 
  • #6
To clairify from my 2nd post, I know that I want mil spec dimensions and tolerancing for the rail sections, but I do not know what those dimensions and tolerances are because the mil specs are given in GD&T and I don't understand GD&T.
 
  • #7
True position is probably the toughest of GD&Ts because it can have a lot of others implied or wrapped up in a single tolerance. Essentially, the tolerance creates a circular zone around the theoretical perfect point where the feature is allowed to lie. There's a fair amount to it. I would highly suggest finding a GD&T book. Your library should have something...anything. There are some background materials you need to be familiar with in order to help you understand what is being toleranced.

Start here:
http://www.tec-ease.com/gdt-tips.htm
 
  • #8
Thanks for the replies and the link Fred. I'll be working on it and see what I can come up with.
 

Related to Converting GD&T to BD&T for Mil Spec Design - Seeking Help and Suggestions

1. What is GD&T?

GD&T stands for Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing. It is a symbolic language used to communicate the design and manufacturing requirements of a part or assembly. It includes symbols, feature control frames, and special tolerances to specify the size, shape, orientation, and location of features on a part.

2. Why is GD&T important?

GD&T is important because it provides a clear and consistent way to communicate design requirements between designers, manufacturers, and quality control personnel. It ensures that parts and assemblies are manufactured to the correct dimensions and tolerances, leading to better functionality, interchangeability, and lower production costs.

3. How is GD&T different from traditional dimensioning and tolerancing?

GD&T is different from traditional dimensioning and tolerancing because it uses symbols and feature control frames to communicate design requirements, rather than just numerical values. It also allows for more precise and specific tolerances, improving the accuracy and functionality of the part.

4. What are the benefits of using GD&T?

Some of the benefits of using GD&T include improved communication and understanding between designers and manufacturers, increased accuracy and functionality of parts, reduced production costs, and improved quality control.

5. How can I learn more about GD&T?

There are various resources available for learning more about GD&T, including books, online courses, and workshops. It is also helpful to practice interpreting and applying GD&T on actual part drawings and seeking guidance from experienced professionals in the field.

Similar threads

  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
956
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • DIY Projects
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top