Change in angular velocity of the following system

[Dale]

still looking at the math side of the problem

The math side of the problem starts with using a consistent theory of gravity. This approach is fundamentally wrong. You need a field theory to make it relativistic and it needs to be a tensor field to be consistent.

 

[Matt Benesi]

It looks like you're saying that non-tensorial line element solutions (Schwarzschild and Kerr), which are the only actual confirmations of GR, are not good enough.

 

[Dale]

It looks like you're saying

I never said anything remotely similar.

non-tensorial line element solutions (Schwarzschild and Kerr),

Those are both tensor solutions.

which are the only actual confirmations of GR

This isn't true either.

Please stop posting misinformation about physics and please don't misrepresent my comments.

 

[Matt Benesi]

I found a solution for angular momentum loss due to gravitational waves for 2 bodies. Since I rewrote the math to include #s of bodies other than 4, I can apply the relativistic angular momentum loss equation to the 2 body problem (although a 4 body problem is still a problem).

I'll let you know how it turns out.

So much for that. It's over 10^-70 too small to account for the angular acceleration, unless I totally coded it wrong.