Age of Universe (Liddles Modern Cosmology)

In summary, the author is having trouble finding the equation for the age of the universe, and thinks that it should be (da/dt)2 on the left-hand side. He thinks that the a-2 dependence on the (1-Ω0) term and the (1-Ω0) term itself being off are problems.
  • #1
hawker3
1
0
Hi,
I am currently reading Liddles Introduction to Modern Cosmology (2nd Ed) and having trouble with problem 8.4, about the age of the universe with a cosmological constant.
The question asks to derive the formula for the age by first writing the Fridemann equation in such a model as
[itex]\frac{da}{dt}[/itex] = [itex]H^{2}_{0}[/itex] [itex][Ω_{0}a^{-1}[/itex] + [itex]\left(1-Ω_{0})a^{-2}\right][/itex]

But I'm not sure how this step is found, so can't proceed any further. I would appreciate any help to get me started.
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #2
Welcome to PF hawker3! :smile:

hawker3 said:
Hi,
I am currently reading Liddles Introduction to Modern Cosmology (2nd Ed) and having trouble with problem 8.4, about the age of the universe with a cosmological constant.
The question asks to derive the formula for the age by first writing the Fridemann equation in such a model as
[itex]\frac{da}{dt}[/itex] = [itex]H^{2}_{0}[/itex] [itex][Ω_{0}a^{-1}[/itex] + [itex]\left(1-Ω_{0})a^{-2}\right][/itex]

But I'm not sure how this step is found, so can't proceed any further. I would appreciate any help to get me started.

I'd be happy to help you, but in order to do so, you need to tell me what form of the Friedmann equation you are starting with. Then I can give you suggestions on what manipulations to perform in order to get it into the form given above.
 
  • #3
I'm having trouble finding a set of conditions in which the formula is correct. Look at the matter-only case for example: a [itex]\propto[/itex]t2/3. Then the left side is [itex]\propto[/itex] t-1/3 whereas the 2 right side terms are [itex]\propto[/itex] t-2/3 and t-4/3.
 
  • #4
BillSaltLake said:
I'm having trouble finding a set of conditions in which the formula is correct. Look at the matter-only case for example: a [itex]\propto[/itex]t2/3. Then the left side is [itex]\propto[/itex] t-1/3 whereas the 2 right side terms are [itex]\propto[/itex] t-2/3 and t-4/3.

I think that the relation a ~ t2/3 is specific to the "critical" or "Einstein-de Sitter" universe which is not merely matter-dominated, but also happens to have a critical density of matter so that Ω0 = Ωm = 1. Hence (1-Ω0) = 0.

Even so, the equation is also a bit off. At the risk of giving too much away, it should be (da/dt)2 on the left-hand side. You can see that this makes things work out for the critical case.

The a-2 dependence on the (1-Ω0) term also seems wrong to me. If you assume that there is no spatial curvature, and that the matter shortfall (1-Ω0) is made up of "something" that has a constant energy density (e.g. dark energy), then this term should have an a2 dependence. If you assume that there is nothing else aside from matter, then (1 - Ω0) is the curvature term, and it should have an a0 dependence (i.e. no dependence on a at all).
 
  • #5


Hello,
I am a scientist with a background in cosmology and I would be happy to help you with this problem. The first step to solving this problem is to understand the components of the Friedmann equation. The Friedmann equation is a key equation in modern cosmology that describes the expansion of the universe. It relates the rate of expansion (represented by the derivative of the scale factor, da/dt) to the density and curvature of the universe. In its simplest form, the Friedmann equation is written as:

\frac{da}{dt} = H(a)

Where H(a) is the Hubble parameter, which is a function of the scale factor. In order to incorporate a cosmological constant into this equation, we can rewrite the Hubble parameter as:

H(a) = H_{0} \sqrt{Ω_{0}a^{-3} + Λa^{-2} + (1-Ω_{0}-Λ)a^{-1}}

Where H_{0} is the present-day value of the Hubble parameter, Ω_{0} is the present-day matter density parameter, Λ is the cosmological constant, and (1-Ω_{0}-Λ) is the present-day dark energy density parameter.

Now, we can substitute this expression for H(a) into the Friedmann equation and simplify to get:

\frac{da}{dt} = H_{0} \sqrt{Ω_{0}a^{-3} + Λa^{-2} + (1-Ω_{0}-Λ)a^{-1}}

Next, we can rearrange this equation to get:

\frac{da}{dt} = H_{0} \sqrt{Ω_{0}a^{-1} + \left(1-Ω_{0})a^{-2}\right) + Λ}

Finally, we can substitute this expression into the original Friedmann equation and solve for the age of the universe, which is given by:

t = \frac{1}{H_{0}} \int_{0}^{a} \frac{da}{\sqrt{Ω_{0}a^{-1} + \left(1-Ω_{0})a^{-2}\right) + Λ}}

I hope this helps you get started on solving problem 8.4. Remember to carefully consider the components of the Friedmann equation and how they relate to the expansion
 

Related to Age of Universe (Liddles Modern Cosmology)

1. When was the universe created?

The current estimation for the age of the universe is approximately 13.8 billion years, based on data from the Planck satellite and other cosmological observations.

2. How do scientists determine the age of the universe?

Scientists use a variety of methods, including studying the radiation left over from the Big Bang, the expansion rate of the universe, and the ages of the oldest stars and galaxies.

3. Has the age of the universe always been the same?

No, the age of the universe has changed over time due to the expansion of the universe. This expansion has caused time to pass differently in different parts of the universe.

4. Can we ever know the exact age of the universe?

Due to the limitations of our current technology and understanding, it is unlikely that we will ever know the exact age of the universe. However, scientists continue to refine their methods and gather more data to get closer to a more precise estimation.

5. How does the age of the universe impact our understanding of the universe?

The age of the universe is a crucial factor in understanding the origin and evolution of the universe. It helps us to better understand the cosmic timeline and the processes that have shaped our universe into what it is today.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
392
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
554
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top