- #1
- 1,271
- 7
In Griffith's "Introduction to electrodynamics" he uses the following definition for spherical coordinates:
[tex]x=r\sin{\theta}cos{\phi}[/tex]
[tex]y=r\sin{\theta}sin{\phi}[/tex]
[tex]z=r\cos{\theta} [/tex]
However, in all previous calculus classes, I have always used the opposite with respect to [tex]\phi[/tex] and [tex]\theta[/tex]. Anyone know why there is this conflict of notation? It is confusing as hell!
[tex]x=r\sin{\theta}cos{\phi}[/tex]
[tex]y=r\sin{\theta}sin{\phi}[/tex]
[tex]z=r\cos{\theta} [/tex]
However, in all previous calculus classes, I have always used the opposite with respect to [tex]\phi[/tex] and [tex]\theta[/tex]. Anyone know why there is this conflict of notation? It is confusing as hell!