Yes, I have done this. I found the f(obs) = (5.1189*10^14)hz
and then I "un-shifted" to find the f(source)=(3.19675*10^15)hz
which gave me lambda=94nm for the source light, but when I use the Rydberg equation from there I get a nonsense answer. Sorry, but can someone check if the problem has an...
I found the observed frequency from the energy. Then I used the receding Doppler shift formula to find, the source frequency but after that when i tried to use the Rydberg equation I got a value for the energy level less than one. and I'm pretty sure my work is right, any help is greatly...
where x is the distance from one speaker
343=(66)(5.197)
wave length =5.197m
x-(50-x)=(5.197)(m+0.5)
I choose m=-10
2x-50=(5.197)(-9.5)
x=0.314m?
Prof says correct answer is 1.6m tho
angular magnification=9.62 part a
1/s+1/s'=5 1/(25-s-s')+1/s"=1/2.6 -s"/s=m
can't find m, don't know how to use the info that a person of normal eyesight is looking into the microscope.
cos(theta)=c/vn
cos(1.2 degrees)=((3*10^8)/v(1.03))
v=291262135.9
v/c=.971
so the particle is moving at (.971)c
But mastering physics tells me this is wrong, and says that I'm not account for the angle.
I am really stumped.