Recent content by 2thumbsGuy

  1. 2

    Solving for x = 0: A Refresher Guide

    OK, that helps. I've actually been working with a much more complex expression that turns out I would need to use imaginary numbers to fully plot, so that hasn't helped. And also I've been mapping a series of formulas and writing checks into excel, which doesn't throw zero on sin(pi), so I'm...
  2. 2

    Solving for x = 0: A Refresher Guide

    OK, I'm confused again. So... arcsin [sin ((x-102)] = arcsin (0) = (x - 10)2 = nπ ...? How does arcsin(0) equal anything but 0?
  3. 2

    Solving for x = 0: A Refresher Guide

    aaaaaaah nice, it's kind of coming trickling back, now. Thank you, sirs!
  4. 2

    Solving for x = 0: A Refresher Guide

    So, x = (√(nπ) + 10)? So then where does arcsin come in?
  5. 2

    Solving for x = 0: A Refresher Guide

    Right, yes! That!
  6. 2

    Solving for x = 0: A Refresher Guide

    It's been a long time since I had to try and figure this stuff out, so a little refresher would be helpful. I'm trying to find where x = 0 in this equation: sin((x-10)^2) I forget how this works. Can I get a little help? Thank you!
  7. 2

    Subtracting functions on specified domains

    Actually, I think the programming solution would be the same as the math solution. As you say, f(x) if x∈[b,c] and F(x)=0 elsewhere, and the same for g(x). This is normal if/then scenario. I know how I can do this! Thanks for helping me think through it.
  8. 2

    Subtracting functions on specified domains

    Thank you very much! This is familiar. To your second question, the domains will vary according to circumstance. For this case we can use a = 1, b = 2, c = 3, d = 4. But they will change many, many times.
  9. 2

    Subtracting functions on specified domains

    both f(x) and g(x) have values outside of the defined domains, but I want to only consider the values within their respective defined domains. I'll be using this in some software, so maybe it's best that I constrain the domains within the software instead of in the math, but I wanted to get all...
  10. 2

    Subtracting functions on specified domains

    OK, so I posted this a few days ago: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/subtracting-the-overlap-of-functions.784184/#post-4925108 What I've come to discover is that I want to understand how I can subtract f(x) on domain [b,c] from g(x) on domain [a,d]. I want to be able to disregard both...
  11. 2

    Subtracting the overlap of functions

    OK, I find it to be desirable where f(x) >= 0 and g(x) >= 0, so how can I restrict the function to that range before performing the subtraction? Or is it specific to the function? EDIT Here are the graphs I came up with to evaluate your statement: Graph 1 ( f(x) )...
  12. 2

    Subtracting the overlap of functions

    I didn't think it would be that simple... let me just do that and see what I come up with. Thanks!
  13. 2

    Subtracting the overlap of functions

    I have a fun project I'm trying to do and it's been a good number of years since I did any math higher than algebra. As such, I don't know how to approach this and would like some pointers. I am trying to understand how I can subtract one function from another ONLY where the two functions...
  14. 2

    Show that the reflected and transmitted waves are related to the incident wave

    Ah. \frac{1}{μ1}B1 = \frac{1}{μ2}B2 \frac{1}{μ1v1}E1 = \frac{1}{μ2v2}E2 E1 = \frac{μ1v1}{μ2v2}E2 E1 = βE2 Ei-Er = βEt Subbing for Et: Ei-Er = β(Ei+Er) Er = Ei-βEi-βEr Er+βEr = Ei-βEi Er(1+β) = Ei(1-β) Er = \frac{1-β}{1+β}Ei So simple! Why didn't I see it...
  15. 2

    Show that the reflected and transmitted waves are related to the incident wave

    OK, I see how you got that. But why would you add them? What about the first two relevant eqns in #2? These solutions so far do not fall into that format, and if I plug in, say (Ei-Er)=βEt it does not resolve.
Back
Top